Out walking last
weekend in Lammas Park I bumped into a landlord I had previously met at a
business networking event in Staines a few weeks ago. We got chatting about the property market and
what the future holds in Staines.
I would now like to
share that conversation with you, my Staines property blog reading friends.
Roll the clock back 20 years and Staines was a very
different place. There were 37,655 households in Spelthorne and 29,065 of those
were owner occupied. Move to the present, and with all the building in the
town, the total number of households has increased by 4.93% to 39,512 and quite
surprisingly (to me at least), the number of owner-occupiers has decreased to 28,671
(although as a proportion, it is only 72.5% compared to 77.1% twenty years
ago).
However, it’s the rented sector that is truly
fascinating … twenty years ago, only 2,323 properties were privately rented in Spelthorne
... and now it’s 5,004 - a rise of 2,681, more than double.
The best way Staines landlords can protect their income from property (and mitigate the effects of the tax rises) is to keep the homes they let out in Grade A condition. I have found, especially over the last three or four years, Staines tenants have ever growing demands from their rental property, but many are prepared to pay ‘top dollar‘ for houses and apartments that meet their high expectations. You must not forget, letting property in Staines (in fact anywhere) is a business, so all private landlords should also seek the advice, opinion and commentary of property professionals.
Just as I was about
to leave with the rest of the family, he asked ‘What of the news of Stamp Duty
changes for Landlords coming in April?’ My thoughts are that, with such low supply (i.e. numbers of property for sale), and
high demand it is hard to imagine Staines property values will see much impact. But I predict, ever so slightly, the proportion
of owner occupiers should increase slightly compared to buy to let landlords in
the coming decade as the housing market rebalances itself slightly.